Tag: Corporate crime

  • Trump indictment live updates: Former president surrenders at Miami courthouse ahead of arraignment on documents charges

    Trump indictment live updates: Former president surrenders at Miami courthouse ahead of arraignment on documents charges


    Trump and Nauta have been booked

    Trump and his also-indicted aide Walt Nauta have completed the booking process in a Miami federal courthouse, a spokesperson for the U.S. Marshals told NBC News.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Trump ally Rep. Ken Buck says he ‘would not feel comfortable with a convicted felon in the White House’

    Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., talks with reporters before a procedural vote on the debt limit bill in the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, May 31, 2023.

    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    Longtime Trump ally Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., said in an interview on Tuesday that he “would not feel comfortable with a convicted felon in the White House” as the former president surrendered at a Miami court to face federal criminal charges.

    Buck referred to the former president’s own words during his presidential win in 2016, when he said Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton should not be in the White House because of her handling of her personal email server.

    “Let’s look at Donald Trump’s words in 2016,” Buck told CNN. “He said that Hillary Clinton was unfit for the White House for the way she handled classified information… So I think his words have set the standard that America will look at in determining whether he is fit for the presidency.”

    — Brian Schwartz

    Co-defendant Walt Nauta arrives at courthouse with Trump

    Walt Nauta, valet to former U.S. President Donald Trump and a co-defendant in federal charges filed against Trump, arrives at the Miami International Airport June 12, 2023 in Miami, Florida. 

    Win Mcnamee | Getty Images

    Former President Donald Trump’s co-defendant, his valet Waltine “Walt” Nauta, arrived at the Miami courthouse along with his boss.

    Nauta is charged with six federal counts, far fewer than Trump’s 37 counts. The charges against Nauta are related to his alleged role in helping the former president hide classified documents from the FBI.

    In addition to charges of concealing federal documents and obstructing justice, Nauta is also charged with lying to investigators about what Trump asked him to do with boxes of presidential documents.

    — Christina Wilkie

    Trump arrives at courthouse

    Former President Donald Trump leaves his Trump National Doral resort Monday June 13, 2023 in Doral, Fla.

    Jim Rassol | AP

    Trump has arrived at the Miami federal courthouse for his unprecedented arraignment on federal criminal charges.

    His motorcade’s trip from Trump National Doral Miami took approximately 25 minutes.

    Kevin Breuninger

    The other special counsel probe: Nevada GOP chair seen entering grand jury room in D.C. courthouse

    Two Republican officials from Nevada were spotted entering the room in the Washington, D.C., federal courthouse where a grand jury is meeting as part of a special counsel probe into the events surrounding the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, NBC News reported.

    The federal criminal investigation into Trump is the second that the Justice Department had tapped Jack Smith to oversee as special counsel.

    Nevada state GOP chair Michael McDonald speaks to Republican supporters at the Nevada election night Republican watch party.

    Brett Forrest | Lightrocket | Getty Images

    Nevada GOP Chairman Michael McDonald and Republican National Committeeman Jim DeGraffenreid were both seen inside the district court building heading into the grand jury room Tuesday afternoon, NBC reported.

    McDonald told NBC last year that he was interviewed by the House committee investigating the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when a violent mob of Trump’s supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol after Trump spent months falsely insisting the 2020 election had been stolen from him.

    Both men participated in a scheme to try to keep Trump in power by sending a false electoral certificate to Congress asserting that Trump won Nevada over the actual winner, President Joe Biden.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Trump heads to courthouse to face federal criminal charges

    The motorcade for former President Donald Trump leaves Trump National Doral resort on Tuesday, June 13, 2023, in Doral Fla.

    Alex Brandon | AP

    Trump has left his Miami-area golf resort and is heading to the federal courthouse for his arraignment on the 37-count indictment accusing him of taking highly classified documents and then obstructing the government’s efforts to retrieve them.

    Trump’s motorcade departed Trump National Doral Miami just after 1:30 p.m. ET.

    Just before his departure, Trump posted on Truth Social: “ONE OF THE SADDEST DAYS IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY. WE ARE A NATION IN DECLINE!!!”

    Kevin Breuninger

    Former national security advisor: Trump kept documents because ‘he thought it would be cool’

    John Bolton, former national security advisor, speaks during a Senate briefing hosted by the Organization of Iranian American Communities to discuss U.S. policy on Iran, in Washington, D.C., March 16, 2023.

    Tom Williams | Cq-roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    Former national security advisor John Bolton has a message for Republicans who think the prosecution of his one-time boss, former President Donald Trump, is politically motivated: “Read the indictment.”

    “This is a very serious case. It’s not financial fraud, it’s not hush money to porn stars, this is the national security of the United States at stake, and I just urge everybody, read the indictment,” Bolton said on MSNBC shortly before Trump’s arraignment.

    “You think there’s political bias inherent in this prosecution? Read the indictment and ask yourself, if this were a Democrat involved in this, would this not warrant prosecution?” Bolton said. “I think we’ve got to take the politics out of this when national security is at stake, and this is a good place to start.”

    Bolton has criticized Trump in the past. But his firsthand knowledge of how Trump approached national security while in office made his observations especially compelling.

    “Why did he keep the documents? Because he liked to say ‘I’ve got it and you don’t.’ Because he thought it would be cool,” Bolton said of Trump. “Because it just struck his fancy on any given day. Did he have more malign motives? Selling it to foreign governments? Using it for blackmail? It’s possible.”

    “It wouldn’t be out of character, but I don’t think we know that,” said Bolton. “But any subordinate who did the same thing would already be in the slammer.”

    — Christina Wilkie

    Police reopen street after investigating suspicious object near courthouse

    Miami Police investigate a suspicious item near the media area outside the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse where former President Donald Trump is scheduled to be arraigned later in the day on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Miami Police reopened a street near the federal courthouse after completing an investigation into a suspicious object discovered there hours earlier.

    The city police were assisting authorities from the Homeland Security Department to respond to the object, which prompted the closure of a section of North Miami Ave.

    “Thank you all for the patience,” the Miami PD tweeted.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Trump’s defenses: The ‘Presidential Records Act’ and the ‘Clinton Socks Case’

    The Truth social network logo is seen on a smartphone in front of a display of former U.S. President Donald Trump in this picture illustration taken February 21, 2022.

    Dado Ruvic | Reuters

    As Trump prepares to face what was likely to be a jury trial on charges that he illegally hung onto scores of classified government documents containing the nation’s most sensitive military secrets, he has repeatedly cited two legal notions that he claims are sufficient to “exonerate” him.

    “The grand jury was never told about the Presidential Records Act or the Clinton socks case, both exonerating!” Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth Social, shortly before his arraignment.

    With the caveat that these are Trump’s justifications in public, and they are not arguments made by lawyers in court, below is what Trump is talking about.

    The Presidential Records Act

    Trump has falsely claimed for several months that a provision of the 1978 Presidential Records Act requires the National Archives and Records Administration, the custodian of official government documents, to “negotiate” with former presidents about what official records they get to keep.

    The law “says you talk, you negotiate, you make a deal,” Trump claimed in a CNN town hall last month.

    In reality, the PRA was passed to codify precisely the opposite — that presidential records do not belong to the former president, they belong to NARA.

    A key sentence in the law is unequivocal: “Upon the conclusion of a President’s term…the Archivist of the United States shall assume responsibility for the custody, control, and preservation of, and access to, the Presidential records of that President.”

    The ‘Clinton Socks Case’

    Another notion Trump frequently raises is what he calls the “Clinton socks case.”

    Here, a judge ruled in 2012 that conservative group Judicial Watch did not have the right to compel the National Archives to seize audio tapes of conversations held between historian Taylor Branch and former President Bill Clinton, who had been out of office for more than a decade.

    The tapes were reportedly kept in a sock drawer at one point, and the name stuck.

    But the two instances have almost nothing in common. In Clinton’s case, the judge ruled that the tapes were more akin to a diary or journal than a presidential record, and therefore were not “official” records under the Presidential Records Act.

    The documents Trump refused to return to the National Archives, however, were inarguably official. They were classified documents generated by federal employees. Many of them were presidential daily intelligence briefings, and they were shared with the president in the course of his official duties.

    It was unclear Tuesday whether Trump’s attorneys would raise either the PRA or the Clinton case during a trial, or whether they would be permitted to do so.

    — Christina Wilkie

    Strange times in Miami

    Osmany Estrada (L) holds a pigs head as he and Gregg Donovan gather outside the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse before the arraignment of former President Donald Trump on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Things are getting weird outside the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. U.S. Federal Courthouse in Miami ahead of former President Trump’s arraignment. One protestor even brought a severed pig’s head on a pike. And, yes, that’s an American flag in the pig’s mouth.

    It wasn’t immediately clear what point the demonstrator, Osmany Estrada, was trying to convey, although he reportedly identified himself as a critic of Trump’s.

    – Mike Calia

    Police respond to ‘suspicious object,’ shut down traffic near Miami courthouse

    Miami Police investigate a suspicious package near the media area outside the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse where former President Donald Trump is scheduled to be arraigned later in the day on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    Miami police and Homeland Security Department authorities responded to a “suspicious object” located near the federal courthouse where Trump is set to soon arrive, a spokesman for the city’s police department said.

    “Traffic has been temporarily shut down” due to the discovery of the object near North Miami Ave. between 3rd St. and 4th St., the spokesman said in a statement.

    Miami police responded around 10:28 a.m. ET, the spokesman noted.

    “We have temporarily closed N. Miami Avenue at NW 5 Street to NW 3 Street,” the department added in a tweet.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Who is Walt Nauta?

    Walt Nauta, personal aide to former U.S. President Donald Trump who faces charges of being Trump’s co-conspirator in the alleged mishandling of classified documents, fixes Trump’s collar before a LIV Golf Pro-Am golf tournament at the Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Virginia, U.S. May 25, 2023. 

    Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

    Trump isn’t the only one whose been indicted on federal charges. His aide, Walt Nauta, faces six charges in connection to the classified documents case, including withholding a document or record and conspiracy to obstruct.

    The 40-year-old Naval veteran from Guam had daily contact with the former president in the Oval Office through setting up meals and organizing travel clothing, NBC News reported, according to a former senior Trump aide. Nauta was a senior chief culinary specialist in the Navy and was part of the Presidential Food Service in the White House, according to NBC News.

    Nauta continued serving Trump after his presidency. Trump wrote on Truth Social last week that Nauta had at some point “retired as Senior Chief, and then transitioned into private life as a personal aide.”

    Walt Nauta follows former President Donald Trump as they board his airplane, known as “Trump Force One,” as Trump heads to speak at campaign events in GA and NC, at Newark Liberty International Airport on Saturday, June 10, 2023, in Newark, NJ.

    Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

    Nauta received payments from Trump’s “Save America PAC” beginning in August 2021, and later appeared on the former president’s 2024 campaign payroll, NBC News reported, based on public election records.

    Prosecutors allege that Nauta was among those who packed items from the White House to be shipped to Florida. But Nauta denied knowledge of the boxes in false statements, they allege.

    — Lauren Feiner

    GOP primary competitor Vivek Ramaswamy asks other campaigns to promise Trump pardon

    Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy discusses FOIA request regarding former President Donald Trump’s indictment outside of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse where Trump is scheduled to be arraigned later in the day on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican presidential competitor Vivek Ramaswamy showed up outside the Miami federal courthouse to issue a challenge to the rest of the primary field: Commit to pardon Trump if elected, or explain why you won’t.

    “That document reeks of politicization,” Ramaswamy said of the 37-count federal indictment against Trump, while wearing a black T-shirt and white baseball cap emblazoned with the slogan “Truth.” in all caps.

    Ramaswamy argued that the indictment is undermined by its “silence” on the Presidential Records Act and a 13-year-old judicial opinion in a case related to recordings of former President Bill Clinton.

    Experts dispute that the ruling — in which Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote that the Presidential Records Act gives the president authority on whether to turn over documents to the National Archives — is relevant in Trump’s case, which involves alleged violations of the Espionage Act and obstruction.

    Ramaswamy, an entrepreneur whose media-friendly campaign has given him an outsize profile in the primary race, has previously vowed to pardon Trump if elected. In his remarks in Miami on Tuesday, he announced that his campaign sent letters to competitors in both the Republican and Democratic primary fields, asking them to either pledge to pardon Trump or explain their refusal to do so.

    But Ramaswamy also noted, “As U.S. president, I would have made different judgements than Donald Trump made” regarding the retention of classified records.

    Ramaswamy’s remarks were at times nearly overtaken by noise from the throngs of protesters and other onlookers stationed outside the courthouse. At one point he attempted to switch from a lectern microphone to a hand-held megaphone, but he quickly switched back after fumbling with the equipment for a few seconds.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Will Trump pose for a mug shot?

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives at Manhattan Criminal Courthouse, after his indictment by a Manhattan grand jury following a probe into hush money paid to porn star Stormy Daniels, in New York City, U.S., April 4, 2023. 

    Brendan Mcdermid | Reuters

    When former President Donald Trump surrenders to authorities at a federal courthouse on Tuesday, he will not be photographed for a traditional “mug shot” picture of his face, a law enforcement source told NBC News.

    In place of a mug shot, a photo of the 2024 GOP presidential frontrunner will be uploaded into the internal booking system, the source confirmed.

    In addition to the photo, Trump’s handprint will be digitally scanned. He also will be required to provide his personal data to law enforcement, including his Social Security number, address and phone number.

    These records, including the photo, will be for internal use only, and not released to the public. Cameras and recording equipment have been barred from the courtroom on Tuesday, so transcripts and sketches will likely be all that emerges from the proceedings.

    — Christina Wilkie

    Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp says Trump charges a ‘distraction,’ doesn’t rule out 2024 run

    U.S. President Donald Trump is greeted by Georgia Governor Brian Kemp as he arrives at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., July 15, 2020.

    Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

    Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp called the federal charges brought against Trump a “distraction.”

    In an interview with CBS News, he also did not rule out a late entry into the 2024 Republican primary for president.

    Kemp, who was among Georgia’s Republican leaders who pushed back on Trump’s efforts to overturn the election in his state, said the federal indictment brought against Trump brought “some serious concerns.”

    Kemp said Republicans should focus on policy matters, such as those tied to inflation and crime, rather than Trump’s legal woes.

    “That’s really what I believe Republicans need to stay focused on, and not get bogged down in the politics of this indictment,” he said. 

    — Brian Schwartz

    Chris Kise applies to represent Trump for the entire trial

    Chris Kise, attorney for former US President Donald Trump, leaves the federal court in West Palm Beach, Florida, US, on Thursday, Sept. 1, 2022.

    Eva Marie Uzcategui | Bloomberg | Getty Images

    In a new filing Tuesday, Florida-based attorney Chris Kise informed the court that he would represent former President Donald Trump “for trial, all proceedings in the District Court, and on appeal.”

    Kise’s filing came just hours before Trump is scheduled to be arraigned. Several prominent Florida lawyers reportedly turned down the job of defending Trump over the weekend.

    Trump is a famously difficult legal client, often eschewing his attorneys’ advice. He also has a long record of fee disputes with his lawyers. That history makes one particular line in the new filing especially noteworthy.

    Written in all caps, the contract states that, “Fee disputes between counsel and client shall not be a basis for withdrawal from this representation.”

    — Christina Wilkie

    Photos show increased security around federal courthouse ahead of arraignment

    MIAMI, FLORIDA – JUNE 13: Members of law enforcement wearing riot gear ride past the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida. Republican presidential candidate former U.S. President Donald Trump is scheduled to appear today for his arraignment on charges including possession of national security documents after leaving office, obstruction, and making false statements. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Win Mcnamee | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    Photos show increased security around the federal courthouse in Miami where Trump will surrender. He is expected to be arraigned at 3 p.m. ET in what are the first-ever federal charges filed against a former or current U.S. president.

    Law enforcement officers tie police tape in front of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse in Miami, Florida, on June 12, 2023.

    Giorgio Viera | AFP | Getty Images

    Department of Homeland Security police and Miami-Dade police walk in front of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse where former President Donald Trump is scheduled to appear on June 12, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Department of Homeland Security police walk around the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse before the arraignment of former President Donald Trump on June 12, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Members of the media line up to enter the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse to cover the arraignment of former President Donald Trump on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    Authorities preparing ‘massive security arrangements’ for Trump court appearance

    Authorities have ramped up the police presence around the Miami courthouse where Trump is set to be arraigned this afternoon.

    Law enforcement officials stand guard outside of the Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. federal courthouse on June 13, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Scott Olson | Getty Images

    The Miami Police Department said it is shutting down multiple streets in the city’s downtown starting at 10 a.m. ET in advance of the former president’s visit.

    “We strongly encourage commuters to avoid the area and seek alternate routes, if possible,” the department said in a traffic advisory, which warned that delays should be expected.

    The statement added that police are working with local, state and federal authorities to provide necessary assistance, including personnel and other resources, to secure the arraignment.

    Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman also pointed to potential security concerns in his ruling barring photo or video recording in the courtroom before the arraignment.

    DORAL, FLORIDA – JUNE 12: A motorcade carrying former President Donald Trump arrives at the Trump National Doral Miami resort on June 12, 2023 in Doral, Florida. Trump is scheduled to appear tomorrow in federal court in Miami for an arraignment on charges including mishandling of classified documents, obstruction, and making false statements. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

    Scott Olson | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    “Allowing photographs would undermine the massive security arrangements put in place,” Goodman wrote.

    A clerk for the Miami courthouse did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the building’s security efforts.

    The Miami-Dade County Police Department told CNBC on Tuesday morning that it “has not received any federal requests for security support,” but will nevertheless “provide any assistance, support, or resources” to the law enforcement effort.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Florida-based lawyer Chris Kise to accompany Trump to arraignment

    Chris Kise, part of former US President Donald Trumps legal team, leaves the Paul G. Rogers Federal Building & Courthouse after a court hearing in West Palm Beach, Florida, on September 1, 2022.

    Marco Bello | AFP | Getty Images

    Trump will be accompanied by Florida-based lawyer Chris Kise at the former president’s expected arraignment, according to sources familiar with the plans. The development appears to resolve a key outstanding issue around the court proceedings Tuesday at what will be the start of the first ever trial of a former U.S. president on federal criminal charges.

    Trump’s two lead lawyers on the case both resigned abruptly on Friday, one day after the government informed them that their client would be charged with 31 counts of willfully retaining a national security document and six other counts of related to alleged efforts to withhold documents, make false statements or obstruct justice.

    The attorneys’ departure left the former president scrambling over the weekend to find a lawyer who was approved to argue cases in the Southern District of Florida, where the charges were brought. Without a Florida-based attorney to file motions in the case, there were concerns that Trump’s arraignment might be delayed.

    Kise, a former solicitor general of Florida, has been part of Trump’s larger legal team since 2022. But shortly after joining Trump’s team, he was reportedly sidelined from the classified documents case.

    Trump is also being represented by New York-based attorney Todd Blanche, who traveled to Florida on Monday with the former president. It was unclear Tuesday morning whether Kise, Blanche, or both men would accompany Trump into court.

    — Christina Wilkie

    Case assigned to Judge Aileen Cannon, controversial Trump pick

    The judge assigned to the former president’s federal criminal case is a Trump appointee who stirred controversy over her involvement in a prior matter related to the classified documents scandal.

    Judge Aileen Cannon last year temporarily blocked the Justice Department from reviewing the documents seized in the FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago and granted Trump’s request to have a special master examine the records.

    Aileen M. Cannon, United States District Judge, Southern District of Florida

    Courtesy: US Courts

    Some legal experts balked at Cannon’s rulings in that case. A federal appeals court overturned her order to appoint a special master, ending the review.

    The New York Times reported that Cannon was assigned Trump’s criminal case randomly, as is the usual process. But Cannon has already faced calls to recuse herself.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Magistrate judge bars recording in Trump courtroom

    The Wilkie D. Ferguson Jr. United States Federal Courthouse where Taylor Budowich, a former spokesman for former U.S. President Donald Trump, appeared before a grand jury is seen on June 07, 2023 in Miami, Florida.

    Joe Raedle | Getty Images

    The federal magistrate judge overseeing Trump’s arraignment has barred any photos or videos from being taken in the courtroom or the outside corridor prior to the former president’s appearance.

    A coalition of more than a dozen local and national media outlets, including NBC Universal, had asked Magistrate Judge Jonathan Goodman on Monday to permit “a limited number of photographs and videorecordings” before the arraignment.

    They also asked the court to immediately release audio recordings of the proceedings to the public. “This is a case of exceptional public interest to the entire country and beyond,” the coalition wrote in a court filing.

    In an order Monday night, Goodman denied both requests.

    “The Press Coalition argues that tomorrow’s first appearance and arraignment are ‘special proceedings,’ but the Undersigned is not convinced,” Goodman ruled.

    “I follow the ‘stay in your lane’ philosophy,” Goodman wrote, noting that his involvement with the case will likely end after the arraignment, when it is handed off to Judge Aileen Cannon.

    “I do not feel it is appropriate for me to rule on what happens in future proceedings when I am not the district court judge and when I will have no involvement whatsoever,” he wrote.

    Goodman also cited court rules that broadly prohibit “all forms” of recording in the district court.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Christie says there’s probably even more evidence against Trump

    Former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie speaks during a New Hampshire Town Hall at Saint Anselm College in Goffstown, New Hampshire, on June 6, 2023. 

    Joseph Prezioso | AFP | Getty Images

    Special counsel Jack Smith’s indictment of former President Trump is packed with detail and evidence, but there’s probably more. A lot more, according to Chris Christie, a former federal prosecutor who’s taking on Trump for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination.

    “What I can tell you, for sure, I know about that indictment, is there’s probably about a third of the evidence they actually have is in that indictment,” the former New Jersey governor and one-time Trump ally said during a CNN town hall Monday night. “When you’re a prosecutor, you never put every card on the table before the trial.”

    Christie, a longshot for the nomination, has nonetheless decided to run so he can directly attack Trump and help keep him from running against President Biden in next year’s general election. Early polls show that Trump is the clear leader in the primary field.

    – Mike Calia

    Trump plans to attend big money fundraiser at his New Jersey golf club after arraignment

    Former President Donald J. Trump speaks about filing a class-action lawsuits targeting Facebook, Google and Twitter and their CEOs, escalating his long-running battle with the companies following their suspensions of his accounts, during a press conference at the Trump National Golf Club on Wednesday, July 07, 2021 in Bedminster, NJ.

    Jabin Botsford | The Washington Post | Getty Images

    Trump is planning to head to his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey for a presidential fundraiser after his arraignment in a Miami courtroom on federal charges that he kept reams of classified documents.

    Trump will be return to his golf course later on Tuesday for a 2024 campaign fundraiser that calls on donors to to raise or give $100,000 for the Trump Save America Joint Fundraising Committee. That amount allows contributors to have a “private candlelight dinner” with the former president and to join a VIP reception with “elected officials & special guests,” according to an invite to the event.

    Trump is scheduled to deliver remarks from his property just after 8 p.m. ET on Tuesday.

    — Brian Schwartz

    How will the case impact the 2024 presidential race?

    Former U.S. President Donald Trump arrives to deliver remarks during the Georgia state GOP convention at the Columbus Convention and Trade Center on June 10, 2023 in Columbus, Georgia. 

    Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

    A federal grand jury has returned an unprecedented indictment against a singular, and singularly positioned, politician leading an unusual presidential primary race.

    So the way the case plays out on the campaign trail is anyone’s guess.

    It may be natural to assume, for instance, that being accused of crimes would damage a candidate’s political standing. But bear in mind that Trump has already been indicted by prosecutors in Manhattan since entering the 2024 Republican primary race, and those charges — 34 counts of falsifying business records — do not appear to have diminished his overall lead in the polls.

    Since the latest indictment, many of Trump’s Republican allies have issued statements defending him, or at least criticizing the Justice Department’s actions. Republicans have lobbed a common suggestion that the agency under the Biden administration has become politicized or “weaponized.” Even some of Trump’s primary opponents have joined in that chorus.

    Some recent polling after the indictment has yielded polarizing results. An ABC News/Ipsos survey conducted Friday and Saturday found almost half of Americans believe Trump should have been indicted — but nearly the same percentage said they think the charges against him are politically motivated.

    Trump, meanwhile, has vowed to stay in the race even if he is convicted. And he is reportedly set to host a campaign fundraiser just hours after his indictment.

    Kevin Breuninger

    Here’s the national security information Trump kept at his resort home

    The DOJ’s indictment includes photos of classified documents found at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago residence.

    Source: DOJ

    Trump kept a trove of classified documents from several federal agencies at his expansive Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, according to an indictment unsealed on Friday.

    Federal prosecutors allege in a 49-page indictment that Trump had documents with details on “defense and weapons capabilities of both the United States and foreign countries; United States nuclear programs; potential vulnerabilities of the United States and its allies to military attack; and plans for possible retaliation in response to a foreign attack.”

    Prosecutors added that Trump’s alleged unauthorized disclosure of the classified documents “could put at risk the national security of the United States, foreign relations, the safety of the United States military, and human sources and the continued viability of sensitive intelligence collection methods.”

    The indictment does not reveal further details of what the documents contain beyond general descriptions, given their classified nature.

    The DOJ’s indictment includes photos of classified documents found at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-A-Lago residence.

    Source: DOJ

    The documents found in Trump’s possession contained intelligence assessments from the Pentagon, National Reconnaissance Office, CIA, NSA and the Department of Energy, which oversees America’s nuclear weapons arsenal, according to the indictment.

    The 37-count criminal indictment adds that Trump kept the classified documents in his bedroom, bathroom, ballroom, office and storage room, all while hosting more than 150 social events “that drew tens of thousands of guests” to the property.

    During an FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago in August, 102 documents with classification markings were seized from Trump’s office and storage room. Of those, 17 were denoted as “top secret,” the highest intelligence classification level. Another 54 documents were labeled as “secret,” according to a tally included in the indictment.

    — Amanda Macias

    What charges does Trump face?

     In this photo illustration, pages are viewed from the unsealed federal indictment of former U.S. President Donald Trump on June 9, 2023 in Washington, DC. 

    Drew Angerer | Getty Images

    The historic first federal indictment of a former president charges Trump with seven different crimes spanning 37 counts.

    Trump is accused of unlawfully taking dozens of documents related to U.S. national defense and storing them at his Palm Beach, Florida, residence and private club, Mar-a-Lago. Many of those documents bore “TOP SECRET” or other classification markings. At least two of them reference nuclear information, according to the indictment.

    Thirty-one of the counts against Trump fall under this charge, known as the Espionage Act, which carries a maximum prison term of 10 years, according to prosecutors.

    Trump is also charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice, concealing documents and making false statements. The charges of obstruction and concealing and withholding documents all bear 20-year maximum prison sentences, while the charges of scheming to conceal and making false statements carry 5-year prison maximums, according to the indictment.

    Here are all the charges Trump — and his aide Walt Nauta, who is also charged in the indictment — face in the special counsel’s case:

    • Willful retention of national defense information: 31 counts against Trump
    • Conspiracy to obstruct justice: 1 count against Trump and Nauta
    • Withholding a document or record: 1 count against Trump and Nauta
    • Corruptly concealing a document or record: 1 count against Trump and Nauta
    • Concealing a document in a federal investigation: 1 count against Trump and Nauta
    • Scheme to conceal: 1 count against Trump and Nauta
    • False statements and representations: 1 count against Trump
    • False statements and representations: 1 count against Nauta

    Kevin Breuninger



    Source link

  • New York, California attorneys general probe NFL workplace practices, discrimination claims

    New York, California attorneys general probe NFL workplace practices, discrimination claims


    NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell speaks during a press conference in advance of Super Bowl LVII at Phoenix Convention Center on February 08, 2023 in Phoenix, Arizona.

    Peter Casey | Getty Images Sport | Getty Images

    The attorneys general of New York and California said Thursday they had opened an investigation into the workplace practices and culture of the National Football League, including claims of gender discrimination.

    The AGs have issued subpoenas to the NFL in connection with the probe.

    “The joint investigation will examine the workplace culture of the NFL and allegations made by former employees, including potential violations of federal and state pay equity laws and anti-discrimination laws,” a press release issued by the AGs said.

    CNBC Politics

    Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

    New York AG Letitia James said, “No person should ever have to endure harassment, discrimination, or abuse in the workplace. No matter how powerful or influential, no institution is above the law, and we will ensure the NFL is held accountable.”

    The NFL has more than 1,000 employees in offices in New York and California, the AGs noted.

    Thursday’s press release cited a February 2022 New York Times article that detailed how more than 30 women who previously worked for the NFL claimed they suffered gender discrimination and retaliation after filing complaints with the league’s human resources office.

    Also last year, a congressional committee found that for decades the workplace of the Washington Commanders team owned by Dan Snyder had tolerated “sexual harassment, bullying, and other toxic conduct.”

    California AG Rob Bonta said Thursday that the AGs have “serious concerns about the NFL’s role in creating an extremely hostile and detrimental work environment.”

    “No company is too big or popular to avoid being held responsible for their actions,” Bonta said.

    In a statement, the NFL said the “allegations are entirely inconsistent with the NFL’s values and practices.”

    “The NFL offices are places where employees of all genders, races and backgrounds thrive. We do not tolerate discrimination in any form,” the league said. “The NFL is committed to ensuring all employees of the league are respected, treated fairly, and have equitable pay and access to developmental opportunities. Our policies are intended not only to comply with all applicable laws but to foster a workplace free from harassment, intimidation and discrimination.”

    This is breaking news. Check back for updates.



    Source link

  • No prison yet for Elizabeth Holmes following last-ditch appeal

    No prison yet for Elizabeth Holmes following last-ditch appeal


    Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes on November 18, 2022 in San Jose, California.

    Justin Sullivan | Getty Images

    Disgraced Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes will not go to prison this week, despite a judge’s order that she begin serving her 11-year sentence on Thursday.

    Late Tuesday, Holmes’ attorneys appealed that ruling to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. Under the court’s rules, that means Holmes will remain free on bail for now.

    Holmes, 39, has two children, the first of whom was born before her fraud trial in 2021. The second was born after her November sentencing.

    A federal jury in San Jose, California, convicted Holmes last year on four counts of defrauding investors in her failed blood-testing company. In November, U.S. District Judge Edward Davila sentenced her to 11 years and three months in prison. Holmes’ attorneys asked that she be allowed to remain free on bail while she appeals her conviction, but earlier this month Davila denied that motion and ordered her to report to prison by April 27.

    In their last-minute appeal, Holmes’ attorneys said Davila’s ruling contained “numerous, inexplicable errors,” including referring to “patient fraud counts” when Holmes was acquitted on the charges that she defrauded Theranos patients. They say she should be allowed to remain free while she appeals her conviction because the appeal is “likely to result in reversal.” The government has 10 days to respond to the motion.

    Federal prosecutors have opposed Holmes’ efforts to remain free. In January, they argued Holmes was a flight risk, noting that she had booked a one-way flight to Mexico shortly before she was convicted. Davila agreed with defense lawyers that the plane ticket episode was merely an oversight, but he ruled that her appeal was unlikely to change the outcome of the case.

    While Tuesday’s motion keeps Holmes out of prison for now, it may only be a brief reprieve. Holmes’ mentor and former boyfriend, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, convicted in a separate trial last year, also sought to remain free pending his appeal, and he appealed to the 9th Circuit when Davila denied his motion. But the appeals court turned down his request within three weeks. Last week, Balwani, 57, reported to a low-security federal prison in Los Angeles to begin serving his nearly 13-year sentence.

    Holmes’ appeal of her conviction, filed last week, argues that Holmes could not have knowingly misrepresented her supposedly “revolutionary” blood-testing technology to investors because she genuinely believed the product worked.

    “Highly credentialed Theranos scientists told Holmes in real time the technology worked. Outsiders who reviewed the technology said it worked. Theranos’ groundbreaking developments received many patents,” the appeal said.

    Her attorneys argued that the government’s case “largely parroted the public narrative,” first laid out in a series of negative Wall Street Journal articles in 2015, that Holmes knowingly committed fraud.

    The appeal challenges multiple rulings by Davila on evidence and witnesses, including allowing a former Theranos lab director to testify as an expert witness. This week, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed a brief in support of Holmes’ appeal.

    The organization argued that the government abused the rules on expert testimony in Holmes’ case, and that it is part of a trend.

    “This sleight of hand is, regrettably, common,” attorney Brian Goldman wrote. “The government has previously subverted the requirements of the federal rules, and blurred the distinction between expert and lay testimony.”

    The government has until May 3 to respond to Holmes’ appeal of the conviction.



    Source link

  • DOJ charges 18 people — including doctors — in massive Covid health-care fraud takedowns

    DOJ charges 18 people — including doctors — in massive Covid health-care fraud takedowns


    Eighteen people, some of them doctors, were criminally charged with Covid-19 health-care fraud schemes that netted hundreds of millions of dollars from false billings and theft from federally funded programs, the Department of Justice said Thursday.

    The charges, which span nine federal judicial districts, comprise the largest coordinated law enforcement action in the U.S. targeting fraud schemes that “exploit the Covid pandemic,” the DOJ said in a press release.

    One California doctor, Anthony Hao Dinh, was charged with allegedly submitting around $230 million in fraudulent claims to the federal Health Resources and Services Administration’s Covid-19 Uninsured Program.

    Dinh, who practices in Orange County, was the country’s second-highest biller to that program, according to the DOJ. The program aimed to provide uninsured patients with access to Covid testing and treatment, but it stopped operating last year due to a lack of funding. 

    Some of the claims Dinh submitted were for services that were not rendered or not medically necessary, prosecutors said. He also allegedly billed the program for the treatment of patients who were insured.

    Dinh allegedly used more than $100 million of fraud proceeds for high-risk options trading. 

    Dinh and two other individuals are also charged with allegedly submitting more than 70 fraudulent loan applications that obtained more than $3 million under the federal Paycheck Protection Program and Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program.

    Another defendant in California, lab owner Lourdes Navarro, is accused of submitting more than $358 million in false claims for lab testing to Medicare, which is the federal health insurance program for senior citizens, to HRSA and to a private insurance company.

    Navarro’s lab performed Covid screening tests for nursing homes and schools, and allegedly increased its reimbursements by adding claims for respiratory pathogen panel tests that providers and facility administrators did not order.

    Other cases announced Thursday involved suppliers of over-the-counter Covid test kits, the DOJ said.

    Medicare last April began to cover without out-of-pocket costs up to eight of those tests a month for beneficiaries who requested them. 

    But some suppliers allegedly “sought to exploit the program” by repeatedly supplying patients with dozens of Covid tests “they did not want or need,” the DOJ said.

    A doctor and marketer in Florida were charged with allegedly purchasing Medicare beneficiary identification numbers and shipping tests to beneficiaries who did not request them.

    That resulted in $8.4 million in fraudulent claims to Medicare, the DOJ said.

    Other cases involved the alleged manufacture and distribution of fake Covid vaccine record cards.

    Defendants in those cases include three medical professionals working at a small midwife practice in New York, who allegedly distributed nearly 2,700 forged Covid vaccine cards to people who were not vaccinated.

    The midwife practice was one of the busiest vaccination sites in the state, the DOJ said. But instead of administering the Covid vaccine, the defendants allegedly destroyed vials of the vaccines intended for patients, the DOJ said.

    Two people in Utah were also charged with allegedly manufacturing and selling about 120,000 fake Covid vaccine cards. Those defendants sold the cards across the U.S., especially in areas that had tighter restrictions around Covid vaccinations, prosecutors allege.

    The DOJ said the people charged with distributing fake vaccine cards “intentionally sought to obstruct” the federal government’s efforts to roll out a nationwide Covid vaccine program.

    “The Justice Department will not tolerate those who exploited the pandemic for personal gain and stole taxpayer dollars,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a press release.

    “This unprecedented enforcement action against defendants across the country makes clear that the Department is using every available resource to combat and prevent COVID-19 related fraud and safeguard the integrity of taxpayer-funded programs.”

    The charges come months after the department created three strike force teams to enhance its efforts to combat and prevent Covid-related fraud. They also follow similar criminal charges related to Covid fraud schemes in April 2022 and May 2021.

    In its announcement Thursday, the DOJ said it had seized more than $16 million in cash in connection with the alleged schemes.



    Source link

  • Frank founder criminally charged with fraud over $175 million JPMorgan deal

    Frank founder criminally charged with fraud over $175 million JPMorgan deal


    Charlie Javice, Founder/CEO of Frank, which is a college financial aid start-up.

    Source: JP Morgan

    The Justice Department on Tuesday criminally charged Charlie Javice, founder of college financial-planning platform Frank, with defrauding JPMorgan Chase out of $175 million. 

    Javice, 31, is accused of “falsely and dramatically” inflating the number of customers Frank actually had in a scheme to “fraudulently induce” the bank to acquire the startup in 2021, federal prosecutors in Manhattan said. She stood to gain more than $45 million from the alleged deception, they added. 

    The one-time rising tech star — who was once named as one of Forbes’ 30 Under 30 — was arrested Monday night in New Jersey and is expected in Manhattan federal court Tuesday afternoon.

    She faces four counts. They are one count of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, one count of wire fraud affecting a financial institution, one count of bank fraud, and one count of securities fraud. Three of the charges each carry a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison. 

    “This arrest should warn entrepreneurs who lie to advance their businesses that their lies will catch up to them, and this Office will hold them accountable for putting their greed above the law,” Damian Williams, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, said in a statement.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission on Tuesday also sued Javice for fraud in connection with the alleged scheme. 

    “Charlie denies the allegations,” a spokesperson for her attorney, Alex Spiro, told CNBC. Spiro had no additional comments, the spokesperson said.

    JPMorgan did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The bank’s CEO, Jamie Dimon, in January called the acquisition of Frank a “huge mistake.”

    The charges come months after JPMorgan filed a lawsuit against Javice alleging she duped the bank into believing Frank had more than 4 million customers. In reality, the startup had fewer than 300,000, JPMorgan said in its suit. 

    Javice used a data science professor to invent millions of fake accounts after JPMorgan pressed for confirmation of Frank’s customer base, the bank alleged. The suit included emails between the professor and Javice, including when the entrepreneur asked, “Will the fake emails look real with an eye check or better to use unique ID?” 

    JPMorgan only discovered the discrepancy when 70% of emails sent to a batch of about 400,000 Frank customers bounced back, according to the bank. It shut down the startup in January. 

    Javice in February filed a counterclaim, saying it was “implausible” that JPMorgan “was led to believe Frank had 4.25 million registered users when its website publicly claimed the company had helped more than 350,000 people access financial aid.”



    Source link