HomeBusinessBankman-Fried draws judge’s rebuke during rambling testimony to jury

Bankman-Fried draws judge’s rebuke during rambling testimony to jury

NEW YORK — Former crypto mogul Sam Bankman-Fried officially began testifying Friday in an attempt to persuade a jury he is not the manipulative fraudster depicted by federal prosecutors and witnesses, but simply a young entrepreneur who did the best he could with a fast-growing company that lacked proper guardrails.

The first three hours of his testimony saw no revelations as his lawyers worked to bolster a narrative Bankman-Fried has promoted since the November collapse of his cryptocurrency exchange, FTX: Mistakes were made, but he always acted in good faith.

Bankman-Fried gave long, rambling answers to the questions posed by defense attorney Mark Cohen. On multiple occasions, U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan asked him to stop talking.

At one point, Kaplan admonished Bankman-Fried for trying to provide his own definition of market manipulation. “You will take what I say manipulation means,” the judge told him and the jury.

Bankman-Fried is the only witness being called by the defense team. His testimony could run through Monday, when he faces cross-examination by prosecutors.

The 31-year-old has pleaded not guilty to seven criminal counts, including fraud and money laundering related to the use of customer funds from FTX. He could spend decades in prison if convicted.

Friday’s proceedings started with a setback for the defense team, when the judge barred it from contending that Bankman-Fried had relied on the advice of lawyers in making critical business decisions. Kaplan’s ruling came after a Thursday hearing in which Bankman-Fried testified without jurors present so the judge could gauge whether the testimony should be admissible.

Bankman-Fried’s attorneys had signaled they would make that legal advice a centerpiece of their case, painting Bankman-Fried as a well-intentioned entrepreneur whose business grew more quickly than his ability to manage it. But Kaplan said Friday that such testimony would be “confusing and prejudicial.”

Instead, he limited the defense’s blame-the-lawyers strategy to decisions made around the collapsed cryptocurrency exchange’s document retention policies.

Bankman-Fried spent the first hour of Friday’s testimony recounting his upbringing, which included summer math camps and living in a college fraternity that was “co-ed, nerdy and dry.” He told of his time working as a trader for Jane Street, and the early days of founding his Alameda Research hedge fund out of an Airbnb filled with cardboard boxes.

At one point during the testimony, Cohen showed the jury a picture of his client working in front of six computer monitors. Bankman-Fried smiled while talking about how many tasks he would work on at once, and for as long as 22 hours a day.

Bankman-Fried said he handed the reins of Alameda to former girlfriend Caroline Ellison and Sam Trabucco in the summer of 2021, when he became too busy with FTX to manage the hedge fund’s day-to-day operations. Bankman-Fried said he envisioned Ellison as the people manager and Trabucco as the risk manager, but when Trabucco left the firm soon after for an “early retirement,” Ellison was left managing both.

Recounting a technical malfunction at Alameda that lost the firm millions of dollars, Bankman-Fried blamed not his associates but the processing power of his computers.

“Once the humans realized what was happening, we shut it down,” Bankman-Fried said.

When Cohen asked whether FTX had a risk management team, Bankman-Fried said, “We sure should have, but no we did not.”

Parts of his testimony were at odds with Ellison’s recollections; she testified that Bankman-Fried regularly called the shots and made important decisions for her even after he left his position as CEO of Alameda.

Sam Bankman-Fried’s legal peril deepens as his defense comes up short

Legal experts say Bankman-Fried, in taking the witness stand, confronts an exceedingly difficult task.

Jurors have spent weeks hearing damning testimony from the fallen crypto king’s top deputies. They consistently depicted their former boss and friend as the architect of a sweeping scheme to siphon billions of dollars in customer funds from FTX, and spend them on risky investments, lavish personal expenditures and political contributions.

Prosecutors have backed up that testimony with reams of documentary evidence. The defendant’s own lawyers have appeared to struggle to raise serious doubts about the credibility of the government’s witnesses or their version of events.

As trial looms, Sam Bankman-Fried’s own words may pose his biggest risk

Bankman-Fried launched FTX in 2019, positioning it as an accessible way for consumers to invest in digital assets. The trading platform received hefty backing from well-known investment firms such as Sequoia Capital, SoftBank and others; it was valued at $32 billion in early 2022 before imploding in November. Bankman’s net worth, once estimated by Bloomberg to be as high as $26 billion, is now near zero.

For many Americans, FTX became the mainstream face of crypto: Celebrities such as NFL star Tom Brady, supermodel Gisele Bündchen and comedian Larry David touted the exchange in Super Bowl commercials.

Newmyer reported from Washington.

Source link



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments